The aging module forced us to retire a “miscellaneous” reason code that had been hiding FX fee drift for months. Mild caveat: the homework load in week four is heavy if your day job is already peak volume.
Flagship course
Ledger Break Investigation
A six-week program for analysts and audit partners who must explain every unmatched transaction in a fintech ledger — and leave a trail regulators can follow.
Outcomes
What you will be able to do
- Build a defensible match-key map across wallet, card, and internal transfer rails.
- Age exceptions with root-cause tags that map to control owners.
- Produce evidence packs that survive sample testing by internal audit.
- Separate timing differences from true breaks without inventing narrative.
Informational price: ₩1,890,000 per seat · includes live labs and office hours. No checkout on this site.
Modules
-
Source integrity
File hashes, cut-off clocks, and why “almost the same extract” fails audits.
-
Match design
Exact, tolerance, and multi-leg matching — with failure modes for each.
-
Aging and ownership
Buckets, SLAs, and how to escalate without flooding engineering.
-
Investigation trees
Structured root cause for amount, party, FX, and fee-path breaks.
-
Evidence packaging
What examiners ask for first, and how to keep screenshots from becoming the whole story.
-
Desk simulation
Timed lab on a synthetic multi-rail day with planted breaks.
Instructor
Haeun Park
Former head of payment controls at a Korea-licensed electronic financial business. Haeun designs Infrastructuresynergy labs from anonymized production patterns — never client data. She co-wrote our settlement window playbooks used in Seosan workshops.
From participants
Notes from recent seats
Evidence packaging finally gave our audit partners a template they stopped rewriting. I still wish Module 2 had one more remittance-corridor example.
FAQ
Do I need an accounting degree?
No. You need familiarity with your ledger exports and a willingness to read processor file specs. We assume Excel or SQL comfort, not CPA credentials.
Is this a tool training course?
No. We stay tool-agnostic. Concepts transfer to in-house matchers, vendor platforms, and spreadsheet bridges.
What is a real limitation of this course?
We do not certify you against a specific Korean regulatory examination, and we cannot review live production data containing personal information. Labs use synthetic datasets; applying methods to your stack remains your team’s responsibility.
How is pricing handled?
Listed amounts are informational. Seats are arranged by invoice through our contact form — there is no online checkout.